Brain machine learning.
Photo credit: theFreesheet/Google ImageFX

The human brain processes spoken language using a layered sequence that almost exactly mirrors the architecture of artificial intelligence, challenging decades of theory about how we understand speech.

A new study led by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem reveals that the neural computations underlying story comprehension unfold in a hierarchy parallel to the deep learning layers of large language models (LLMs).

Using electrocorticography to record brain activity in participants listening to a 30-minute podcast, researchers discovered that the brain’s “step-by-step buildup” toward understanding aligns surprisingly well with how AI models analyse text.

“What surprised us most was how closely the brain’s temporal unfolding of meaning matches the sequence of transformations inside large language models,” said Dr. Ariel Goldstein, lead researcher at Hebrew University. “Even though these systems are built very differently, both seem to converge on a similar step-by-step buildup toward understanding.”

Tone and meaning

The study found that early neural responses in the brain align with the initial layers of AI models, which track simple word features. Conversely, later responses in key language regions such as Broca’s area align with deeper AI layers that process context, tone and meaning.

These findings challenge traditional linguistic theories that suggest comprehension relies on rigid symbolic rules. Instead, the research supports a more dynamic, statistical approach where meaning emerges gradually through layers of processing—much like a neural network.

Crucially, the researchers found that AI-derived contextual embeddings predicted brain activity better than classical linguistic features such as phonemes and morphemes, suggesting the brain integrates meaning in a more fluid way than previously believed.

The team, which included collaborators from Google Research and Princeton University, has publicly released the dataset to help scientists test competing theories of human cognition.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Space mining ‘gold rush’ is off but water extraction may save Mars missions

The dream of an asteroid mining bonanza has been grounded by a…

AI chatbots flip votes by 10 points but sacrifice truth to win

Artificial intelligence chatbots can shift voter preferences by double-digit margins during elections,…

Political rivals ruin your golf game and your office productivity, study finds

Professional golfers choke when paired with political opponents, losing thousands in prize…

Amazon in deadly new ‘hypertropical’ climate unseen for millions of years

The Amazon rainforest is transitioning into a new, hostile climate state characterised…

Daydream believing a better boss can actually work, brain scans reveal

Employees dreading their next performance review might have a new secret weapon:…

Right-wing voters more susceptible to conspiracies but logic fails both sides

People who lean politically to the right are more likely to fall…