Elites and political polarisation.
Photo credit: theFreesheet/Nano Banana Pro

A small group of influential voices is driving deep societal rifts, creating a level of political polarisation in which opposing sides have “nothing left in common”.

New research from Aalto University used network theory to quantify the partisan divide, revealing that a tiny “elite” cluster — potentially just a few hundred people — accounts for a disproportionate share of societal division.

The study measured “alignment”, which tracks how closely a person’s views on one issue match their views on others. By 2023, this alignment reached near-maximum levels among online thought leaders, meaning a progressive view on climate almost certainly guaranteed a progressive view on immigration, while conservative social views paired with conservative economics.

“In democracies, it’s healthy –– even desirable –– to disagree sharply on individual issues. But when alignment becomes complete, society splits into just two camps that disagree on absolutely everything –– there’s nothing left in common with the other side,” said Mikko Kivelä, Professor of Computer Science at Aalto University.

The network structure

The algorithm identified these elites not by their job titles, but by their position within the network structure.

“Not all thought leaders –– the so-called elite –– are politicians. But even without knowing exactly who they are, we can infer their status from the network’s structure. You don’t end up at the centre by accident,” said Ali Salloum, a doctoral researcher and lead author of the study.

This intractable siloing leads to political gridlock, where legislation stalls and decision-making falters. However, the researchers warned that studying these dynamics is becoming impossible as platforms restrict data access.

“It’s especially frustrating when we already know what’s inside the black box, and the value of all that data that the platforms control. By law, researchers should have access, but it’s not being followed. In my opinion, we don’t have enough political pressure directed at keeping these platforms transparent and open,” said Salloum.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Journalism schools lack consistent AI strategy as scattershot policies confuse

Artificial intelligence is becoming deeply embedded in journalistic workflows, yet new research…

AI uses rapid facial ageing to predict cancer survival chances

When battling cancer, the speed at which your face physically ages could…

Lower-income nations lead the world in digital health literacy

It is a common assumption that national wealth automatically translates into stronger…

AI chatbots lose up to 30 per cent accuracy when trained to be friendly

Training chatbots to sound warmer and more empathetic makes them significantly less…

AI ‘photo booth’ reads the faces of lab mice to detect their hidden pain

Assessing pain in laboratory mice is notoriously difficult, often relying on subjective…

Your AI chatbot addiction is a deliberate corporate design, exploiting loneliness

Millions of people are developing severe, life-altering addictions to artificial intelligence chatbots…